India's tourist cities unfit for living
Desk Report
| Published: Tuesday, December 30, 2025
Image: Aviation Express.
Historic
destinations like Jaipur struggle with urban decay, toxic air and poor
infrastructure despite tourism boom and massive infrastructure spending
Indian tourist cities are becoming increasingly unliveable
for residents despite attracting millions of visitors annually, with historic
destinations plagued by toxic air, crumbling infrastructure and inadequate
waste management systems.
Jaipur, Rajasthan's amber-hued capital famous for opulent
palaces and majestic forts, exemplifies the crisis. Local taxi driver told BBC
correspondent that centuries-old architectural monuments stand defaced by
tobacco stains, jostling for space with car repair workshops. "Want the
royal charm of Jaipur? Don't come here, just buy a postcard," the driver
quipped, reflecting resigned hopelessness about urban decay.
Crisis extends beyond tourist destinations to major
metropolitan areas. Bengaluru, known as India's Silicon Valley, witnessed
public outbursts from billionaire entrepreneurs and citizens fed up with
traffic congestion and garbage accumulation. Mumbai residents staged rare
protests against worsening potholes as clogged sewage dumped waste onto flooded
streets during monsoon.
Delhi's toxic winter smog forced doctors to advise
vulnerable residents to leave the capital. Even footballer Lionel Messi's
December visit was overshadowed by fans chanting against poor air quality.
Vinayak Chatterjee, veteran infrastructure expert,
identified historical governance failures as the root cause. "When India's
constitution was written, it spoke of the devolution of power to the central
and state governments, but it did not imagine that our cities would grow to
become so massive that they would need a separate governance structure,"
Chatterjee told BBC.
World Bank data shows over 50 crore Indians, nearly 40 per
cent of the population, now live in urban areas. This represents staggering
growth from 1960 when only 7 crore Indians resided in cities.
Constitutional amendment in 1992 attempted to empower local
bodies with urban governance, but provisions remain largely unimplemented.
"Vested interests don't allow bureaucrats and the higher levels of
government to devolve power and empower local bodies," Chatterjee
explained.
Indian mayors lack powers to raise revenue, appoint
officials or allocate funds independently. State chief ministers act as super
mayors, controlling city-level decisions. This contrasts with China, where city
mayors wield substantial executive powers over urban planning and
infrastructure.
Ankur Bisen, author of Wasted, described Indian mayors as
"the weakest organs of the state, closest to the citizenry, but tasked
with the toughest problems to solve". He noted exceptional cases like
Surat after the 1990s plague and Indore in Madhya Pradesh, where empowered
bureaucrats achieved transformative changes through individual brilliance
rather than systemic reform.
India faces deeper challenges beyond fractured governance.
Last census, conducted over 15 years ago, recorded 30 per cent urban
population. Informally, nearly half the country now displays urban
characteristics, with next census delayed until 2026. "But how do you even
begin to solve a problem if you don't have data on the extent and nature of
urbanisation?" Bisen questioned.
Government has invested hundreds of billions in
infrastructure upgrades, building modern airports, multi-lane highways and
metro networks. However, Indian cities continue ranking at bottom of global
liveability indexes. Mumbai, which publicly harboured dreams of becoming
another Shanghai in the 1990s, remains unable to realise that ambition.
Ramanath Jha, Distinguished Fellow at Observer Research
Foundation, highlighted China's centralised planning model where local
governments maintain implementation freedom with central monitoring. Chinese
city mayors have powerful Communist Party connections, making positions
"important stepping stones for further promotions" according to
Brookings Institution. "How many names of mayors of major Indian cities do
we even know?" Chatterjee asked.
Data vacuum and non-implementation of frameworks outlined in
74th constitutional amendment reflect weakening grassroots democracy, experts
warned. Chatterjee expressed surprise at lack of public outcry about urban
decay comparable to anti-corruption movements from previous years.
Bisen suggested India requires a "cycle of
realisation" similar to London's Great Stink of 1858, which prompted
construction of new sewerage systems and ended cholera outbreaks. "It's
usually events like these when things reach a boiling point, that issues gain
political currency," Bisen said.
Indian cities generate millions of tonnes of rubbish
annually, but waste disposal systems remain inadequate. Tourist destinations
suffer particularly as heritage sites deteriorate while hosting increasing
visitor numbers, creating paradox where cities market historical grandeur while
infrastructure crumbles around monuments.
Source: BBC News