Logo
Airlines Airports Manufacturers Tourism Hotels Expats Life Style Corporate Regulators Face to Face
Aviationexpress.news is Under Development
Final version is coming soon...

Why Boeing 737 MAX price surges past Airbus 320neo?

Desk Report | Published: Sunday, November 30, 2025
Why Boeing 737 MAX price surges past Airbus 320neo?

Image: Collected.

Boeing's 737 MAX carries a higher price tag than rival Airbus A320neo despite fierce competition in the narrowbody aircraft market, with list prices revealing significant differences between the two manufacturers.

Boeing 737 MAX 8 lists at $11.7 crore (117 million dollars), whilst Airbus A320neo costs $11.06 crore (110.6 million dollars). Top-end 737 MAX 10 reaches $13.49 crore (134.9 million dollars), making it the priciest variant in Boeing's narrowbody range.

Production costs explain much of the price gap. Airbus designed the original A320 in the 1980s with a modern airframe that easily accommodated future engine upgrades. Boeing, however, had to modernise an aircraft dating back to the late 1960s. The 737 sits lower to the ground, creating engineering challenges when integrating larger CFM LEAP-1B engines. Manufacturer had to reposition aircraft parts, adjust landing gear, and rework flight control systems.

Boeing's pricing strategy also plays a role. Company sets higher list prices to begin negotiations at stronger positions. Airlines typically secure discounts ranging from 40 to 60 per cent, depending on order size and delivery timing.

Southwest Airlines operates the world's largest 737 MAX fleet with 273 aircraft, plus 510 on order. IndiGo leads A320neo operators globally.

Both manufacturers publish list prices that rarely reflect actual payments. Boeing positions the MAX as offering superior performance, longer range, and higher passenger capacity, justifying elevated pricing despite Airbus emphasising efficiency and lower operating costs.

Source: Simple Flying

Make Comment

Login to Comment
Leaving AviationExpress Your about to visit the following url Invalid URL

Loading...
Comments


Comment created.

Related News